Home arrow Opinion arrow Bainimarama Has The Moral High Ground
Bainimarama Has The Moral High Ground
Written by Dr. Sukhdev Shah   

The verdict is almost unanimous. That is, from the High Priests of Democracy—United States, Great Britain, France, Fiji’s regional benefactors New Zealand and Australia, and now, The Commonwealth Secretary-General Don McKinnon.

 

The verdict is that Fiji’s democracy, its democratic institutions, its law- abiding citizens and, indeed, the country’s entire fabric of lawful governance is under seize by its gun-toting military brass in the person of Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama. Don McKinnon characterizes the Government-Military stand-off as a regrettable disregard for the concerns of ordinary people in Fiji.

 

Threats by an unelected military of forcibly evicting a democratically elected Government- so the argument goes--are creating an impossible situation for Fiji that will undo and reverse its many decades of achievements in economic, political, and human rights fields, and has the potential to render the country’s outlook so bleak that hordes of abused and impoverished people from these islands will create an unimaginable problem for Fiji’s more affluent neighbors—New Zealand and Australia—in terms of human tides crashing at their shores!.

 

There is another perspective, though, that would characterize the Fiji situation otherwise - looking at the brighter side of the “clean-up” campaign championed by Commodore Bainimarama - assuming that Commodore is clean-hearted about his professed mission and is making a sincere commitment to realize his vision.

 

If, indeed, the Commodore adheres to his vision of Fiji and Fiji society, it would not be reckless to envision him being counted as one of history’s Greats

If, indeed, the Commodore adheres to his vision of Fiji and Fiji society, it would not be reckless to envision him being counted as one of history’s Greats - Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and possibly, Kamal Ata-Turk of Turkey.

 

There are many aspects of the lives of Lincoln, Gandhi, and Mandela that made these people Great but one common thread that runs through their greatness is the compassion they showed for the weak, for the vulnerable, for those threatened for their lives and trying to preserve their dignity in absolutely intolerable circumstances.

 

There were nothing else these great people did that come even close to what they did for their countries’ minorities—Blacks, Muslims, and Whites. By making the protection of minorities as the focal point of their struggle for creating a just society, a representative system of government, and an environment of tolerance, acceptance and accommodation, these great men changed the course of history that would benefit the mankind for generations to come.

 

It would be ludicrous, irresponsible, and unwise for me to assert such greatness for Commodore Bainimarama, without knowing much of his background and of the society he envisions Fiji to become. But looking at the substance of his differences with Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase and his stubborn resistance to making even minor adjustments to the terms of his negotiations with The Prime Minister, I have absolutely no doubt that the Commodore is after something truly great.

 

Let us review the bills that Commodore is opposing and wants them be thrown out—lock, stock, and barrel—no negotiations, no tinkering, no adjustments. [To use Bainimarama's expression: We can argue all day about the rule of law and democracy until the cows come home but this (that is the disputed Bills be thrown out) is what we want].                                               

 

If the Qarase Government professes itself to be legal and democratic, the substance of the Unity Bill is outright illegal and its intent unabashedly undemocratic. Why then would The Prime Minister is refusing to admit—and act upon—that the 2000 Coup was an illegal, unconstitutional act, while telling the world that Commodore Bainimarama’s threats against his Government—also democratically elected—are illegal and unconstitutional?

 

Why the perpetrators of the 2000 Coup still hold high positions in his Government, while Commodore Bainimarama’s actions are being portrayed as seditious?

 

Moving along on the question of the legality of Commodore Bainimarama’s actions, why, during the 2000 crisis, did Australia not send its navy and commandos to rescue the democratically-elected leadership of Fiji, held hostage by the thugs for nearly two months, while it is risking the lives of its Navy men for launching the so-called rescue mission for its citizens trapped it Fiji’s stalemate who, in fact, feel safer here in Suva than they would on the streets of Sydney?

 

Finally, why did New Zealand do nothing in terms of mediating the dispute between warring parties in the 2000 crisis which it is doing now to avert the 2006 crisis? Such double-standards extend to threats made by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who would expel Fiji military from peacekeeping duties, while the organization had nothing of substance to say during many of Fiji’s previous coups? 

                       

The other two bills that The Commodore opposes - 'Qoliqoli Bill' and 'Indigenous Claims Tribunal Bill'—are more damaging to Fiji’s long-term interests and to its standing in the community of civilized nations than anything ever conceived by an evil mind, with self-destructive instincts to the core.

The other two bills that The Commodore opposes - 'Qoliqoli Bill' and 'Indigenous Claims Tribunal Bill'—are more damaging to Fiji’s long-term interests and to its standing in the community of civilized nations than anything ever conceived by an evil mind, with self-destructive instincts to the core. Even before The Qoliqoli Bill has been passed, there are reports of harassment of resort and hotels owners by local thugs posing as Qoliqoli owners. There are also reports of fights between Qoliqoli owners straying into each other’s fishing grounds.

 

These reports, to say it mildly, are alarming, especially for a country so much dependent on tourism dollars for job creation and fueling of economic growth on the hilt of foreign investment!

 

In short, The Qoliqoli Bill and its companion, The Indigenous Claims Tribunal Bill, threaten the livelihoods of Fiji’s half of wage-earning and salaried workforce, whereas there are very few options for creating substitute employment.

 

Then, if the Qoliqoli Bill has such deleterious consequences—even ignoring the human rights issue of depriving a large segment of country’s population from access to essential amenities of life--why would then the international community, or any one with Fiji’s wellbeing at heart, voice support for a person or Government who is hell-bent on spearheading the passage of the Bill, while demeaning the intent of the one who is having the courage to stand-up against such an evil?

 

Cadre’s opposition to the bills in question may not be taken as his intention to protect the minorities’ rights. At least this is not the view shared by many Indo-Fijians I have talked to and, indeed, many of them would agree with Cane Growers Union boss Mr. Jagannath Sami that Army’s threats against Government are illegal and undemocratic and must be opposed.

 

So, it may appear that Commodore Bainimarama’s modus operandi of opposing the bills and asking for punishment for the coup plotters has other intentions than the protection of minorities’ interests and promotion of fairness and equality in country’s governance.

 

However, even if this be correct, the “side-effects” of Bainimarama's clean-up campaign would still be profound and sort of earth-shaking, in terms of it helping to create an environment of fairness, justice and equality, and assuring protection for everyone irrespective of differences in appearance and beliefs.

 

Most importantly, this change of environment will help lift country’s economic fortunes, in a way that could make it an economic powerhouse of the region, rivaling Singapore and Hong Kong.

 

The reasons for such optimism are simple. What the country has experienced in the aftermath of the 1987 coup is a decisive break in the way a civilized and modern nation is governed and cares for its citizens. In a more fundamental way, we can say that the Fiji State—as a modern nation—died with the events of 1987, and the troubles and restlessness we experience today—political disarray, economic decline, law and order deterioration and, above all, the dying out of any sort of optimism about the future—are kinds of smell coming out of the rotting corpse of Fiji State.

 

I am not sure Commodore Bainimarama’s clean-up campaign will help resurrect a dead State but the risk he is taking is worth the attempt.

 

The threat to Bainimarama's endeavors will not be from Qarase and his companions, who, I would say, have lost all moral authority to govern and be trusted. The threat will be from the indigenous Fijian and Church leaderships who have most to lose from liberalism, secularism, inclusion, integration, and a humanistic approach to uniting people that, apparently, seems to be the goal of C’dore’s clean-up campaign. 

Comments (4)add comment

Isaia Lawaniyasana said:

It is indeed an assumption that the motives of the Commander as pure.

You are forgetting that Bainimarama is also tainted by the same events that you have said are the grounds that disqualify Qarase from having the "moral authority" to rule. The 2000 coup.

Who was part of the party that asked the then president to step aside?
Who tried to abrogate the 1997 Constitution?
Who was in charge of the RFMF, and had the ultimate control of the soldiers, CRW and non-CRW alike?
Who brought in Qarase and did not return power to the Labour coalition?
Who is still stuck in 2000, and has not moved forward since then?

The same person who is now "in charge" of Fiji. If he was so righteous, maybe removing the plank from his eye would enable him to see clearly and enable him to remove the speck from the eyes of others.

 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
19 December, 2006
Votes: +0

Mereani Kama said:

Mr Lawaniyasana...forgive me but you sound like you'r'e not well versed with the laws and what happened in Fiji to necessitate the Commander asking the President to step aside. He did this to safeguard Rt Mara and his family's safety and also render the military complete authority to step in and take control of the situation in Fiji which was sliding down the path of anarchy and lawlessness. I am a Fijian and why are people now condemning the Commander who was the public saviour in those days of mayhem in 2000. He gave those in authority now the chance to steer this country into prosperity but they bowed to the whims of chiefs who dictated as according to how they can best benefit and not for the people. Qarase forgot that withouth the military, he would not have been given the seat of power during the interim term which led to him forming a political party that was going to lead this country into destruction through a biased electoral system and through the use of public funds to help garner support for its party. Fiji is still evolving and this is part of its rebirth into a better future. My best wishes to the Commander and his team and hope that they maintain professionalism in everything they do and not be swayed by power and greed or the criticisms from the public.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
20 December, 2006
Votes: +0

bobby said:

Pls stop the war of words and try and steer Fiji forward.We in the hotel industry are suffering.
Regards
Bobby
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
29 January, 2007
Votes: +0

Robert said:

NOw..Frank is punching himself 4 letting my Mr. Q to 2 be P.M in 2000.
Mr. Q just didn't help Fiji..esp. us ordinary people...!!!
put on V.A.T...increase the retirement age to 60...but didn't supply the 1000s of jobs for us young graduates....!!!
[was it Mr. Q's government that took the retirement age to 60?]
I feel sorry for the normal village people.
But what can we do...? I sometimes don't know who's wrong/right?
I can only pray for my beautiful Fiji and its people.


As for our SO-CALLED BIG BROTHERS...!!!! its like BIG-BACK-STABBERS.
For them to slap a travel ban for us esp. our SPORTS brothers and sisters..and it'll be very effective...how about they do it for all Fijians going across.
Or they could just stop their citizens from coming.I BET YOU THEY COULD NEVER DO IT.

It was so sweet that our 7's lads beat the crap out of their team in front of their eyes.I tell you..the yaqona on Saturday nite was just soooooooooo SWEET.


 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
06 February, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev